Seventeen photographs had survived the editing process, but selecting the images was only half the challenge. Before any photograph can be discovered, licensed or purchased, it needs accurate photo metadata to help search engines, stock libraries and potential buyers understand what it contains. This chapter explores why great photographs often go unseen and the vital role metadata plays in helping the right people find them.
Seventeen photographs; At least, that was where the previous chapter ended.
Seventeen images that captured the best moments from our time inside the wallaby walkthrough.
Seventeen images that had outlasted hundreds of other frames.
Seventeen images that seemed ready to continue their journey from pouch to platform.
Then we left them alone overnight.
The following morning, we returned with fresh eyes.
It is amazing how different a photograph can look after a night’s sleep.
Images that felt strong the evening before suddenly seemed less convincing.
Near-identical photographs revealed a clear winner.
Tiny distractions became obvious.
Small differences in sharpness suddenly mattered.
The collection shrank again.
Seventeen became thirteen.
Some photographers might see that as losing four photographs.
We saw it differently.
Those four images had done their job.
They had helped us identify the photographs that were truly the strongest.
Now thirteen images remained.
Thirteen photographs that represented the very best moments from the shoot.
With the photographs finally selected, our attention turned briefly to the videos.
Briefly.
Video is a very different proposition.
A photograph can be reviewed in seconds.
Video demands far more time.
Every clip needs to be watched carefully and with concentration. Then watched again. Special moments have to be identified, trimmed, reviewed and compared. What takes a fraction of a second to assess in a photograph can take minutes to evaluate in video.
There was also the question of value.
While wildlife video can be incredibly rewarding professionally and financially, it is often far more time-consuming to prepare and process than still photographs.
For now, the videos would have to wait.
The photographs were further along in the workflow and represented the quickest route towards getting the project in front of potential buyers and clients.
That did not mean the videos were less important.
In fact, a brief review had already revealed that they contained some of the most special moments from the entire visit.
The tiny nose of a joey moving within the pink folds of its mother’s pouch.
Small movements and behaviours that were barely noticeable at the time.
Moments that would only fully reveal themselves when viewed frame by frame on a larger screen.
Those exciting and rewarding discoveries would come later.
For now, our focus remained on the thirteen photographs.
The editing process was complete.
Or so we thought.
Because a great photograph is not automatically a visible photograph.
That is the uncomfortable reality facing photographers everywhere.
The quality of a photograph and the visibility of a photograph are not always the same thing.
A remarkable image with poor metadata can remain buried and undiscovered.
A less remarkable image with accurate descriptions, keywords and categorisation may be discovered thousands of times.
Success often lies somewhere in the balance between the two.
Strong photography creates the opportunity.
Strong metadata helps people find it.
Without both working together, even the best photographs can quietly disappear into the growing ocean of images uploaded every day.
In fact, some of the best photographs ever taken remain unseen.
Not because they lack quality.
Not because they lack meaning.
But because nobody knows they exist.
A photograph can tell a story instantly to a human being.
A mother wallaby carrying a joey.
A tiny nose emerging briefly from the safety of the pouch.
A moment of curiosity.
A moment of trust.
A moment that lasted only seconds.
We can recognise all of that almost immediately.
Computers cannot.
To a search engine, stock agency or image database, a photograph is simply a file until somebody explains what it contains.
That explanation comes in the form of metadata.
The hidden information attached to an image.
Titles.
Descriptions.
Keywords.
Categories.
Location information.
The words that help transform a photograph from something that exists into something that can be discovered.
Without metadata, our thirteen photographs might as well have been hidden away inside a box in the attic.
The images would still exist.
Nobody would know where to find them.
This is one of the biggest misconceptions in photography.
Many people believe the hard part is capturing the image.
In reality, capturing the image is only half the challenge.
The second challenge is making sure the right people can find it.
A wildlife enthusiast searching for wallabies.
A magazine editor looking for marsupial behaviour.
A conservation organisation creating educational material.
A travel company promoting wildlife experiences.
Each of them may be searching for something different.
The photograph has to speak their language before it can be discovered.
That means every image needs careful thought.
What is actually happening in the photograph?
What species is visible?
What behaviour is being displayed?
What details would somebody search for if they had never seen the image before?
The answers are rarely as simple as they first appear.
A photograph of a wallaby and joey is not just a wallaby and joey.
It may also be wildlife.
Nature.
Animal behaviour.
Parenting.
Marsupials.
Conservation.
Curiosity.
Family bonds.
Education.
Every image contains layers of information.
The challenge is deciding which of those layers matter most.
And for thirteen photographs, that process was only just beginning.
Unfortunately, this is often where another problem begins.
Metadata is rarely the most exciting part of photography.
After hours spent travelling, shooting, reviewing and editing, many photographers reach the metadata stage already mentally exhausted.
The temptation is understandable.
A title is written.
A description is created.
A collection of keywords is assembled.
Then, rather than starting again for every photograph, the same information is copied and pasted from image to image, and often from platform to platform.
After all, something is better than nothing.
At least the photographs have metadata.
The problem is that photographs from the same shoot are rarely identical.
One image may capture a joey emerging from a pouch.
Another may show animal behaviour.
Another may focus on a close-up portrait.
Another may tell a story about parenting, curiosity or conservation.
The differences can be subtle, but they matter.
When the same generic metadata is applied to every image, those individual details can become lost.
Some agencies will identify overly generic metadata and reject the submission.
Others may accept it.
But acceptance does not necessarily mean the metadata is doing its job.
The photograph may still be hidden from the very people who would value it most.
The tiny nuances that make an image unique are often the same details that help somebody discover it.
When those details are not described, the photograph risks becoming just another image in an ever-growing library.
A great photograph deserves more than a generic description.
It deserves metadata that reflects the story it is actually telling.
For thirteen photographs, that was the challenge that lay ahead.
Not editing.
Not photography.
Finding the words that would help the right people discover the stories we had already captured through the lens.
Create Photo Metadata using SpeedData Pro
